Parents and teachers’ perspectives on acceptance of giftedness traits in children with giftedness and talented


Patricia Kwalzoom Longpoe
Mary Ashelo Mbugadu


Purpose: The general purpose of the study was to investigate parents and teachers perspectives on acceptance of giftedness traits in children with gifted and talented in Afijio Local Government of Oyo State.

Methodology: Three research questions were raised to guide the researchers in the study. Descriptive design method was used for the study. Purposive sampling techniques was used in selecting the respondents for the research work. Instrument used for data collection was self-structured questionnaire administered to fifty (50) secondary school students in Afijio Local Government Area of Oyo State. The method employed for data analysis was Frequency count, percentage (%), mean and standard deviation to answer the research questions. This instrument reliability was measured using Cronbach’s Alpha (α) with 0.84 as the internal consistency. 

Results: The findings of the research showed that gifted and talented in children was a gain on the parent part (X = 3.32). It was also agreed by the respondents that their teachers love asking them questions in class because they know they would definitely produce answers to the questions (X = 3.20). It could therefore be deduced from the findings that, parents were comfortable with their children with gifted and talented and their parents have good perspectives about them.

Conclusion/ Recommendations: It was recommended among others that there should be more help coming from the parents of gifted and talented children at home with the provision of other amenities to enhance their gifted traits. It was also suggested for further studies that it would be interesting to explore how parents and teachers recognize and support giftedness.


How to Cite
Longpoe, P. K., & Mbugadu, M. A. (2024). Parents and teachers’ perspectives on acceptance of giftedness traits in children with giftedness and talented. Journal of Educational Research in Developing Areas, 5(1), 62-71.


  1. Adewuyi, T.O. (2012). Construction material waste planning and control techniques on building sites in South-South of Nigeria. Unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Building, Faculty of Environmental Studies, University of Uyo, Nigeria.
  2. Berman, K. M., Schultz, R. A., & Weber, C. L. (2012). A lack of awareness and emphasis in preservice teacher training. Gifted Child Today, 36(1). 44-50.
  3. Brighton, L. J., Moon, L. E., Jarvis N., Hockell, J. J.,(2007). Difficult Conversations: Evaluation of multiprofessional training. BMJ Support Palliat Care, 8(1), 45-48. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2017-001447.
  4. Chan, S. (2010). Applications of Andragogy in Multi-Disciplined Teaching and Learning. Journal of Adult Education, 39, 25-35.
  5. Davis, G. A., Rimm, S. B., & Siegle, D. (2011). Education of the gifted and talented. Pearson Education.
  6. Davis, G., Rimm, S., & Siegle, D. (2011). Education of the gifted and talented. Pearson Education.
  7. Endepohls-Ulpe, G., & Ruf. H. (2005). Primary school teachers' criteria for the identification of gifted pupils.
  8. Federal Republic of Nigeria (2014). National Policy on Education 4th Edition. Federal Government Press.
  9. Ford, D. Y. (2012). Ensuring equity in gifted education. Suggestions for change (again). Gifted Child Today, 35(1). 44-52.
  10. Geake, J. G., & Gross, M. U. M. (2018). Teachers’ negative affect toward academically gifted students: An evolutionary psychological study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(3), 217-231.
  11. Gross, M. U. M. (2010). The “me” behind the mask: intellectually gifted students and the search for identity. Roeper Review, 20(3), 167-174.
  12. Hayden, K. (2011). Ideas for independent projects for gifted young students. Retrieved March 11, 2011.
  13. Kanaitsa, (2010). Review activities for the academically gifted.
  14. Kassiani, N (2023). What Is Purposive Sampling? | Definition & Examples. Scribbr.
  15. McBee, M. (2010). Examining the probability of identification for gifted programs for students in Georgia elementary schools: A multilevel path analysis study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(4). 44-53.
  16. Moon, T. R., & Brighton, C. M. (2018). Primary teachers' conceptions of giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 31(4), 447-480.
  17. Nova Scotia Department of Education (2010). Gifted Education and Talent Development.
  18. Plunkett, J. W. (2010): E-Commerce & Internet Business Industry Market Research, Statistics, Trends & Leading Companies
  19. Rizza, M. G., & Morrison, W. F. (2003). Uncovering stereotypes and identifying characteristics of gifted students and students with emotional/behavioral disabilities. Roeper Review, 25(2), 73-77.
  20. Rizza, M. G., & Morrison, W. F. (2013). Identifying twice exceptional children: A toolkit for success. TEACHING Exceptional Children Plus, 3(3) Article 3.
  21. Rotigel, J. V. (2013). Understanding the young gifted child: Guidelines for parents, families, and educators. Early Childhood Education Journal, 30, 209-214.
  22. Salvia, J., Ysseldyke, J. E. & Bolt, S. (2010). Assessment in special and inclusive education. Wadsworth.
  23. Shrutika, S. (2023). Bridging the Gap: Overcome these 7 flaws in descriptive research design.
  24. Silverman, L. K. (2013). Counseling the gifted and talented. Love Publishing Company.
  25. Wright, L. (2010). Identifying young, poten¬tially gifted, economically disadvantaged students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38 (4), 164–171.
  26. Zoya, S. G. (2013). Sampling methods in research methodology; how to choose a sampling technique for research.