Effects of Felder-Silverman’s learning styles model on students’ achievement in secondary school physics in Bassa Local Government Area, Nigeria

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Nov 6, 2020
https://doi.org/10.47434/JEREDA.1.2.2020.167
Download
PDF
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020)

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Macmillan Mafulul Josiah
Department of Science and Technology Education, University of Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria
Kinnayi Thompson Jesse
Plateau State Ministry of Education, Government Secondary School, Buji, Nigeria
Mangut Mankilik
Department of Science and Technology Education, University of Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria

Abstract

Purpose: The study determined the achievement of students in physics when exposed to Felder-Silverman’s learning styles, amongst others.


Methodology: The separate-sample pre-test, post-test quasi-experimental research design was adopted. The population was 419 senior secondary two (SSII) students offering physics in 31 schools in Bassa Local Government Area, Nigeria.  A sample of 88 students obtained from four intact classes were used. The instruments used were the Index of Learning Style Questionnaire (ILSQ) and Physics Achievement Test (PAT). Construct validity and content validity were respectively performed on the ILSQ and PAT. The test-retest method was used to obtain the reliability coefficient of ILSQ as 0.86. Kuder-Richardson formula 20 was used to obtain the coefficient of PAT as 0.81. ILSQ was administered, before PAT, as pre-test so as to place students into the learning styles. After teaching for four weeks, using the lecture method, PAT was administered as post-test. The mean and ANCOVA were respectively used to answer the research questions and hypotheses.


Results: Visual/verbal and sensing/intuitive learners achieved higher than the active/reflective and sequential/global learners, amongst others.


Findings: A major finding was that sensing/intuitive and visual/verbal learning styles had significant effect on students’ achievement but active/reflective and sequential/global learning styles had insignificant effect.


Recommendations/Classroom Implications: Students should be encouraged to put their learning styles into use. When students are exposed to the different dimensions of learning styles, their achievement in Physics may be improved.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Josiah, M. M., Jesse, K. T. ., & Mankilik, M. (2020). Effects of Felder-Silverman’s learning styles model on students’ achievement in secondary school physics in Bassa Local Government Area, Nigeria. Journal of Educational Research in Developing Areas, 1(2), 167-180. https://doi.org/10.47434/JEREDA.1.2.2020.167
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Alao, A. A., & Abubakar, R. B. (2010). Gender and academic performance for college physics students. A case study of Department of Physics/Computer Science Education, Federal College of Education (Technical) Omoku, Nigeria. Journal of Education Research in Education and Society, 1(1), 129-137.
  2. Bhat, M. A., & Govil, P. (2014). Understanding learning styles of secondary school students in relation to certain variables. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2 (11), 1-8.
  3. Bostrom, L. (2012). Do ten-year-old children in Sweden know how they learn? A study of how students believe they learn compared to their learning style preferences. International Education Studies, 5 (6), 11-23.
  4. Dahlan, N. A., Noor, N. A. M., & Hashim, K.S. (2010). Exploring the gender gap in achievement in Malaysia: A case for learning styles. The International Journal of Learning, 17(4), 15-27.
  5. Federal Republic of Nigeria, FRN (2014). National policy on education (6th edition). NERDC Press.
  6. Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning styles and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674-681.
  7. Felder, R. M., & Spurlin, J. (2005). Applications, reliability and validity of the index of learning styles. International Journal of Engaging Education, 21(1), 103-112.
  8. Filgona, J. (2016). Effects of hands-on learning strategies on students’ achievement. Lambert Academic Publishers (LAP).
  9. Hawk, T. F., & Shah, A. J. (2007). Using learning style instruments to enhance student learning. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 5(1), 1-19.
  10. Inyang, U. S., & Josiah, M. M. (2016). Students’ gender and perceived difficulty ofconcepts in secondary school physics in Jos metropolis, Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education. 6(5-version VI), 1-5.
  11. Jiraporncharoen, W., Angkurawaranon, C., Chockjamsai, M., Deesomchok, A., & Euathrongchit, J. (2015). Learning styles and academic achievements among undergraduate medical students in Thailand. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 12 (38), 1-7.
  12. John, O. K., & Ademola, O. R. (2014). A comparative study of public and private school students’ science achievement in Katsina state, Nigeria. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 3 (3), 203-207.
  13. Kelly, M. G. (2013). Using learning preferences to direct teaching and balance academic performance. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42 (5), 20-28.
  14. Ku, D. T., & Chang, C. (2011). The effect of academic discipline and gender difference on Taiwanese college students’ learning styles and strategies in web-based learning environments. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10 (3), 265-272.
  15. Ling, A. S., Basit, A., & Hassan, Z. (2017). Does learning style impact student academic performance? International Journal of Education, Learning and Training, 2(2), 1-13.
  16. Mijinyawa, M., Yeldu, M. Y., Umar, Z., & Hussaini, H. B. (2017). A comparative study of academic performance of public and private secondary school students in science in Birnin Kebbi metropolis, Kebbi State, Nigeria. The Beam Journal of Arts and Science, 11, 1-10.
  17. Mohammad, M. M., Heong, Y. M., & Kiong, T. T. (2017). Cognitive learning style conceptual framework in vocational education. The Social Sciences Medwell, 12 (5), 855-861.
  18. Munir, N, Ahmad, N., Hussain, S., & Ghani, U. (2018). Relationship of learning styles and academic performance of secondary school students. Rawal Medical Journal, 43 (3), 421-424.
  19. Mutua, M. N. (2015). A correlation study studies between learning styles and academic achievement among secondary school students in Kenya. A thesis in the University of Nairobi, Kenya.
  20. Naik, B. (2013). Influence of culture on learning styles of business students. International Journal of Education Research, 8 (1), 129-139.
  21. Nigerian Educational Research and Development Council. (2008). Senior secondary school curriculum: Physics for SSS 1-3. NERDC.
  22. Nja, O. B., Umali, C. B., Asuquo, E. E., & Orim, R. E. (2019). The influence of learning styles on academic performance among science education undergraduates at the University of Calabar. Educational Research and Reviews, 14(17), 618-624. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2019.3806.
  23. Ogbeba, J., Odoh, O. C., & Adeke, S.A. (2014). Students learning styles, gender and their effects on physics students’ achievements in senior secondary school. Journal of Scientific Research, 1(15), 73-80.
  24. Okon, C. E., & Archibong, U. I. (2015). School Type and students’ academic performance in social studies in junior secondary certificate examination (JSCE). Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies MCVER, 4(2), 421-426.
  25. Omar, N., Mohammed, M. M., & Paimin, A. N. (2014). Dimension of learning styles and students’ academic achievement. Procedia-Social and Behavior of Sciences, 204, 172-182.
  26. Oomen, N. M. (2015). Learning style and academic achievement in Biology of secondary schools. International Journal of Current Research, 7 (8), 19818-19820.
  27. Platsidou, M., & Metallidou, P. (2009). Validity and reliability issues of two learning style inventories in a Greek sample: Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory and Felder & Solomon’s Index of Learning Styles. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20 (3), 324-335.
  28. Prajapati, B., Dunne, M., Bartlett, H., & Cubbidge, R. (2011). The influence of learning styles, enrolment status and gender on academic performance of optometry undergraduates. Ophthalmic Physiological Optics, 31, 69-78.
  29. Safe, A. (2008). New educational psychology. Fourth press. Duran publication.
  30. Tella, A., & Adeniyi, O. (2009). Locus of control interest in schooling self-efficacy and academic achievement in Cypriot. Journal of Educational Studies, 4, 168-182.
  31. Tuan, L. T. (2011). Matching and stretching learners’ learning styles. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(2), 285-294.
  32. West African Examinations Council, WAEC (2019). WAEC’s e-learning tool kit. www.waeconline.org.ng.
  33. Zhou, M. (2011). Learning styles and teaching styles in college English teaching. International Education Studies, 4(1), 73-77.